Carbon Footprints: Which is Worse?
Hamburgers or Hummers? Photo: fox_kiyo, Flickr
When determining a carbon footprint, we must look at both the primary footprint that can be controlled (such as how much oil we use and how often we wash our clothes). We must also consider the secondary footprint, which is the amount of energy that is used to make the oil and water available to us. Still, it is interesting to compare different aspects of our lives to see what has the greatest negative impact on the earth.
Hamburgers vs Hummers: If you were going to compare the carbon footprints of eating meat versus driving an SUV, you might look at the carbon study of a hamburger by Jamais Cascia. According to the study, America's consumption of hamburgers leads to 941 to 1023 pounds of greenhouse gas per year. It is believed that eating hamburgers is equivalent to 7,500 or 15,000 large vehicles. Compare the average of habit of 150 hamburgers a year to the yearly footprint of a Hummer and you get an average of 56 kilograms of carbon emissions versus 11.1 tons of CO2. It's a good thing we don't eat Hummers, but even better that every hamburger eating American does not drive a Hummer.













