Alaska sues in attempt to get polar bear off endangered species list
.jpg)
Why would the denizens of the Last Frontier State want to reduce protections for the majestic white bear that's everybody's favorite global warming poster animal? The bear was listed as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act, and that means that it's entitled to protections, including habitat protection. Alaskan governor Sarah Palin contends that the "threatened" designation imposes an undue burden on the rugged northernmost state, because the bear lives in some areas which are possible oil-drilling sites. So she and her administration are suing the federal government to reverse their designation.Setting aside the fact that we really should be looking for a wide range of solutions to our energy problems, beyond just drilling more oil (which is why I've been so happy to hear Obama talk about tuning up our tires), this move brings up my old question about Alaska's future in a post-oil world. It seems that the state has been running on resource extraction for years - maybe it's time for some more forward-thinking economic development. Polar bear tourism, anyone?
It's Energy Independence Day! 
Green Your 4th of July Celebration
The Importance of Pollination - It's Not Just Bee Sex
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-20-2008 @ 11:56PM
indiffera E said...
The very fact that the State of Alaska is contesting what scientists have determined is necessary to protect one of the most beloved and important animals in our ecosystem is shocking. It is ignorant and foolish and I hope that this is soon put to rest, so that polar bears can sleep soundly without the sound of oil derricks hammering in their back yard. Enough said about who in the presidential race might be responsible for this action...
IE
Reply