Australians chain themselves to rail cars
About 50 protesters recently chained themselves to Australian freight train cars and railways to oppose the use of coal to fuel the railways. As a result, 20,000 tonnes of coal from three different trains were unable to unload their shipment, bringing operation to a halt for about six hours(making the protesters quite smug, and causing the police to enact "special measures" - ie, bring in horses to control the crowd).
Australia heavily relies upon coal for electricity and billions in export revenue, and boasts the world's largest coal terminal in Newcastle. Officials say they will draft guidelines for implementing carbon emissions trading, to address climate change concerns. The pollution caused by increased coal use is harming the nearby Hunter River (and people's lungs), and many citizens say the government is failing to properly restore mined areas.
But in the meantime, the emphasis on coal is still there, and in addition to powering the continent's electricity, the industry employs tons of decent workers, making a living for their families. It's easy to protest coal, but it's also important to see the other side of the industry: hard-working, decent people, many of whom have been in the coal business for centuries and do not know any other trades. Working in the mines - and on the railways - is a way of life for many coal workers, and it's not an easy thing to strip away their jobs and livelihoods.
It's imperative that we find alternatives to coal - ones that cost about the same, are just as prevalent, and can do just as good of a job.These exist, but haven't been implemented on such a huge scale.
It's imperative that we find alternatives to coal - ones that cost about the same, are just as prevalent, and can do just as good of a job.These exist, but haven't been implemented on such a huge scale.
It's Energy Independence Day! 
Green Your 4th of July Celebration
The Importance of Pollination - It's Not Just Bee Sex
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-14-2008 @ 2:19PM
Baron said...
I sure hope that all the trouble those 50 folks caused didn't actually cost more in terms of a carbon footprint then they helped. I wouldn't want them to get so upset they didn't go and protest again when they found out that bringing operations to a stop, having lots of folks (from police, to news, etc) around, and then starting operations back costs a substantial amount of waste to be produced. That would truly be sad for them. Maybe that time would have been better spent for them if they would have worked on doing things in a more appropriate and more effective manner.
Reply