CFCs to LEDs: Your greenest lighting choices

2009 will mark the 130th anniversary of Thomas Edison's lightbulb; ironically enough, it will also be one of the last years in which incandescent lighbulbs will be sold in the United States. By 2014, the U.S. government hopes to completely remove incandescents from store shelves. Instead, most people will be using CF, or compact fluorescent, bulbs. Basically a small fluorescent tube that has been wrapped in a tight spiral, CFs are far more efficient than traditional bulbs. They last for over six times as long and use about a quarter of the electricity of incandescents. Yet, amid complaints about their potentially hazardous components, I began to wonder if CFs really are the best lighting choice.
To get a better feeling for CFs, incandescents, and other lighting options, I talked to Susan Aiello. The President of Interior Design Solutions and author of a Sustainable Design blog, Susan is a certified interior designer, and a LEED Accredited Professional. She has designed for Architectural Digest, Vanity Fair, and The Apprentice: Martha Stewart. As a specialist in sustainable, green interior design, Susan had a lot to say about the relative benefits of various lighting solutions.
What are the shortcomings of CF lightbulbs?
To begin with, fluorescent bulbs contain mercury, which is a hazardous waste. While the EPA has specific instructions for handling CFLs that break indoors, little is being said about safe disposal. Most trash is sent to dumps or public landfills; CFLs that are disposed of in this way are likely to break and leak mercury, which could leach into the aquifer and end up in our water supplies.
I thought all fluorescent light bulbs contain mercury. Why is this such a big concern right now?
You're right; all fluorescent lights contain mercury, and improper disposal has been a problem for years. The trouble is that, if the government mandates that CF bulbs will completely replace traditional incandescent lightbulbs, there will be a major increase in the number of mercury-bearing fluorescent tubes that are working their way through the disposal system. If these tubes end up in landfills, there will be a major increase in the amount of mercury leaching into the water supply. Also, CF tubes sometimes end up breaking in the home, contaminating living spaces with mercury. This is particularly a problem for families with children.
What can be done about proper disposal?
There are already programs for properly collecting and disposing of fluorescent tubes, but the infrastructure is insufficient. For example, some stores have a single day of the week in which customers can drop off their bulbs. However, many customers will forget, or won't know about the designated return days. In all likelihood, unless we develop a concerted, organized system for collection, most of these CF bulbs will end up in landfills. We need to make it easy for consumers to do the right thing.
If CFs present a disposal problem and incandescent bulbs use too much electricity, what other options are there?
One option is LED, or light-emitting diodes. These are the bright little lights that are used in alarm clocks, traffic lights, and Maglite flashlights. They use very little electricity, are reasonably priced, last for a really long time, and can be disposed of through the regular trash system without pollution concerns.
Are LEDs currently being used for lighting?
Yes! Previously, one of the major problems with LEDs was that it was difficult to make them imitate the soft, yellowish light of an incandescent bulb. For a while, companies were creating incandescent-style light by mixing various-colored LEDs together to produce an appropriate color mix, but that was a difficult and work-intensive solution. Recently, though, companies have begun putting out LED lightbulbs that beautifully replicate the color of incandescents.
Are there any other benefits to LEDs?
Well, another great aspect of LEDs is that they can be dimmed. The importance of a dimmer is that it allows homeowners to reduce their electrical expenditure while adjusting their lighting according to their needs. After all, if you've got a lot of light coming in through a window, you don't need much artificial light, but as the day gets darker, you will need more and more artificial light to compensate. This is where a dimmer comes in.
Dimming a CF light requires a special ballast, and fixtures that were originally designed for incandescent bulbs do not have these ballasts. LEDs, on the other hand, can use the same dimmers as incandescent lights. Instead of installing a new fixture with a dimming ballast, the LED user can just use a dimmer switch. Overall, LEDs are a lot easier to integrate into our everyday lives. They behave like incandescents and can be disposed like incandescents, without all the fuss that is associated with CF bulbs.
Are LED lighbulbs available to consumers?
For a long time, they were only available to contractors, but they've recently been working their way out into the mainstream market. Currently, you can find them online at a lot of retailers, although they haven't shown up in too many stores yet. Basically, people just don't realize that they're out there. Right now, they're pretty expensive, but they're safer, easier to use, require less energy, and last about six times as long as CF bulbs. In the long run, they're the safest, greenest choice!













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-22-2008 @ 10:46AM
Andrew W. said...
LED bulbs last 6x as long as CFLs? My CFLs last somewhere between 7 and 8 years according to the packaging. Now, that would mean that an LED bulb would last 42-48 years. Can that be right?
Reply
5-22-2008 @ 11:03AM
Bruce Watson said...
Andrew-
According to the manufacturers, CFLs are designed to last for 10,000 hours, while LEDs are designed to last for 60,000 hours. If you ran a light for 24 hours a day, the CFL would, ideally, last for 416 days, while the LED would go for 2500 days, or almost seven years.
It sounds like the manufacturers are assuming about 4 hours per day of use, which means that the CFL would last for a little less than 7 years. If used for the same amount of time, the LEDs would, presumably, go for 41 years.
When you look at it like that--wow, that really IS a long time.
5-22-2008 @ 2:20PM
the goddess anna said...
I'm stocking up on regular lightbulbs until these LEDs become mainstream. CFs give me migraines.
Reply
5-22-2008 @ 2:52PM
Bruce Watson said...
I'm with you on the earlier ones, which used to flicker, but I've had pretty good luck with later models. Except, of course, for the one that I got at the dollar store, which put out a bluish light and made my living room look like the set from Requiem for a Dream!
5-22-2008 @ 5:37PM
the goddess anna said...
We spent scads of money on top-notch ones, and still the headaches persist. I'm sensative to light, but we can't have dim bulbs all over the house - it would be impossible to do anything! We use the CFs we have left in the kids' rooms, and regular bulbs where I spend the most time.
Of course, I'm learning to appreciate just opening up the blinds for light too - and not turning on the lights until we really need to. : )
5-23-2008 @ 9:35AM
Rottiepaws said...
I have a bunch of LED bulbs, but I stopped buying them due to the fact they flicker. This is unhealthy just as CRT computer monitors were.
Reply
5-23-2008 @ 9:40AM
Phil L. said...
Bruce -
Thanks for this timely article.
Some thoughts...
I'd like to see what "real" LED life span is like.
For example, I've noticed that semi tractor trailer bulbs (which are now almost exclusively LEDs) start to lose sections of segments well before the light fixture fails completely. If household LED bulbs behave similarly, they might end up needing to be replaced well before their expected life span because the light output is no longer acceptable.
I'd like to experiment with household LED bulbs - but the price is still a big obstacle. The savings calculator spreadsheet found in the productdose.com link above specifies a $54.95 LED bulb as being equivalent to a $1.345 incandenscent bulb (I wish they linked to specifications for the LED bulb). Given that my kids have already killed one pricey CFL after less than one month of use, I'm not anxious to spend $54.95, just to try it out. And I've looked at some of the LED bulb web sites - I'm not sure what I should buy as a general-purpose lighting bulb, and don't have the budget to test a selection of them.
I'd like to see some LED bulbs working in person before putting down money, but haven't seen anything at brick-n-mortar stores but the closet-grade screw in bulbs that are about a 5-10W incandescent equivalent.
I did test some 120V LED strip lighting (an eBay find at about $20 per strip, IIRC). They look cool - but weren't even close to bright enough to be a 1-for-1 replacement for the under-cabinet fluorescent fixtures in my kitchen (which was my original hope). I'd likely need 3 to 4 of them to replace a single fluorescent bulb - which means I'd need about $500 of them. Ouch.
I can argue savings on power cost - but that spreadsheet assumes 60K hours. My kitchen lighting probably stays on an average of 6 hours a day; which means 60K hours stretches out 27+ years. That's way too far out for useful comparison.
So, for the moment, I'm replacing dead incandescents with CFL where it makes sense - and hoping LED finally comes through with useful, affordable replacements.
Final question for readers: Do you have experiences with general-purpose LED lighting you'd like to share? I'm particularly interested in LED solutions that have high enough quality output that you'd consider them as a sole reading light source.
Reply
5-23-2008 @ 9:45AM
Bruce Watson said...
Phil-
Fair points all. Actually, as Lewis pointed out, that link is pretty old--basically, I just included it for the stat comparisons, not the prices. Still, LED lights are a little expensive for my tastes.
On the other hand, I am going to try this product:
http://www.solutions.com/jump.jsp?itemID=12001&itemType=PRODUCT&iProductID=12001
It only has six LEDs, but it might still put out a decent amount of light. After all, my Maglite does a great job with just one. Depending on it's effectiveness, I might write it up.
Please keep me posted on your LED experiments. Bottom line, the actual LEDs are not that expensive to produce, which means that the price will likely plummet as the bulbs start getting produced en masse.
5-23-2008 @ 9:46AM
Lewis said...
That linked ProductDose article is over 2 years old. Judging from comments there I would say there have been some big advancements in LED technology since that article was written.
Sounds like I'm off to do my own research. But thanks for reminding me about the LED option.
Reply
5-23-2008 @ 9:47AM
Bruce Watson said...
Lewis-
Sorry about the age of the article--I put it up because of the attached product comparison, which is still appropriate. Best of luck in your search!
5-24-2008 @ 6:26PM
Carrie said...
My concern with CFLs is that most people are not going to dispose of them properly, and once they become mainstream, we'll have billions of CFLs leaking mercury into our soil and water.
http://naturalmomstalkradio.com/blog/concerns-over-fluorescent-lights/
Reply