Green Daily

Hello PETA friends,
when you all die from Cancer, or what ever illness I'm working to fight against, please don't seek the drugs I'm working on to cure you. I'm only trying to save my mother and those that believe that there is a cure. I want to make a difference.

Reply

Rebecca....quit being a selfish bitch. There's never going to be a cure for cancer.

Reply

oops I meant the later

Reply

Also, I'll work on lung cancer just for you...bonghit. :)

Reply

wow, looking back on some of you older comments I can only surmise that you weren't hugged enough as a kid. I can hug you if you'd like.

Reply

I'll take a slab of bacon off that sow!

Reply

(1) Less than 2% of human illnesses (1.16%) are ever seen in animals.
(2) According to the former scientific executive of Huntingdon Life Sciences, animal tests and human results agree only '5%-25% of the time'.
(3) 95% of drugs passed by animal tests are immediately discarded as useless or dangerous to humans.
(4) At least 50 drugs on the market cause cancer in laboratory animals. They are allowed because it is admitted the animal tests are not relevant.
(5) Procter & Gamble used an artificial musk despite it failing the animal tests, i.e., causing tumours in mice. They said the animal test results were 'of little relevance for humans'.
(6) When asked if they agreed that animal experiments can be misleading 'because of anatomical and physiological differences between animals and humans', 88% of doctors agreed.
(7) Rats are only 37% effective in identifying what causes cancer to humans. Flipping a coin would be more accurate.
(8) Rodents are the animals almost always used in cancer research. They never get carcinomas, the human form of cancer, which affects membranes (e.g lung cancer). Their sarcomas affect bone and connecting tissue: the two cannot be compared.
(9) Up to 90% of animal test results are discarded as they are inapplicable to man.
(10) The results from animal experiments can be altered by factors such as diet and bedding. Bedding has been identified as giving cancer rates of over 90% and almost nil in the same strain of mice at different locations.
(11) Sex differences among laboratory animals can cause contradictory results. This does not correspond with humans.
(12) 9% of anaesthetised animals, intended to recover, die.
(13) An estimated 83% of substances are metabolised by rats in a different way to humans.
(14) Attempts to sue the manufacturers of the drug Surgam failed due to the testimony of medical experts that: 'data from animals could not be extrapolated safely to patients'.
(15) Lemon juice is a deadly poison, but arsenic, hemlock and botulin are safe according to animal tests.
(16) Genetically modified animals are not models for human illness. The mdx mouse is supposed to represent muscular dystrophy, but the muscles regenerate without treatment.
(17) 88% of stillbirths are caused by drugs which are passed as being safe in animal tests, according to a study in Germany.
(18) 61% of birth defects are caused by drugs passed safe in animal tests, according to the same study. Defect rates are 200 times post war levels.
(19) One in six patients in hospital are there because of a treatment they have taken.
(20) In America, 100,000 deaths a year are attributed to medical treatment. In one year 1.5 million people were hospitalised by medical treatment.
(21) A World Health Organisation study showed children were 14 times more likely to develop measles if they had been vaccinated.
(22) 40% of patients suffer side effects as a result of prescription treatment.
(23) Over 200,000 medicines have been released, most of which are now withdrawn. According to the World Health Organisation, only 240 are 'essential'.
(24) A German doctors' congress concluded that 6% of fatal illnesses and 25% of organic illness are caused by medicines. All have been animal tested.
(25) The lifesaving operation for ectopic pregnancies was delayed 40 years due to vivisection.
(26) According to the Royal Commission into vivisection (1912), 'The discovery of anaesthetics owes nothing to experiments on animals'. The great Dr Hadwen noted that 'had animal experiments been relied upon...humanity would have been robbed of this great blessing of anaesthesia'. The vivisector Halsey described the discovery of Fluroxene as 'one of the most dramatic examples of misleading evidence from animal data'.
(27) Aspirin fails animal tests, as does digitalis (a heart drug), cancer treatments, insulin (causes animal birth defects), penicillin and other safe medicines. They would have been banned if vivisection were heeded.
(28) In the court case when the manufacturers of Thalidomide were being tried, they were acquitted after numerous experts agreed that animal tests could not be relied on for human medicine.
(29) Blood transfusions were delayed 200 years by animal studies, corneal transplants were delayed 90 years.
(30) Despite many Nobel prizes being awarded to vivisectors, only 45% agree that animal experiments are crucial.
(31) At least 450 methods exist with which we can replace animal experiments.
(32) At least thirty-three animals die in laboratories each second worldwide; in the UK, one every four seconds.
(33) The Director of Research Defence Society, (which exists to defend vivisection) was asked if medical prgress could have been acheived without animal use. His written reply was 'I am sure it could be'.

Reply

If you have children with ALL you know you should be arrested for child abuse. Meat is cancer causing and so is chicken, pig, lamb, dairy, veal, and any types of meats. None of my doctors eat any of it as they are educated that meat is the cause of most all disease. You are just a propit whore and just want money for your home if you really have one you would know the truth.

Reply

I'm a mother and a friend; I hope none of you suffer from any debilitation illness that my family has suffered. My husband had cancer at 4. He is a good man. He survived. I now long to help others since meeting him. That is why I became a scientist.

Reply

moooo!

Reply

It's so sad....is it really necessary to abuse a woman to make a point. It forty degrees outside and she's pregnant and naked. Peta wants to protect animal rights, but they abuse the women?

Reply

I couldn't care less about the wackos that make up PETA. However, I do like to see a beautiful woman in the nude.

For the ones who claim to be Christians who also go along with the PETA baloney you might consider another read of the Bible.

As for me, I, and countless generations of my family before me, have been hearty meat eaters for accumulative millenniums. I don't expect that to change any time soon and our health has not suffered because of it, quite to the contrary actually.

But, if it makes you feel better, I'll try real hard to feel some sort of guilt the next time I sit down to a nice juicy steak supper or a pork chop breakfast.

LMAO!!!!!

Reply

This is stupid. First of all, do these people realize that these species aren't on the endangered species list simply because we keep them for eating. Second, being a vegetarian isn't healthy. We NEED PROTIEN, and while their are a few plant source, you can be the easiest is from animals. Lastly, these people sound like a bunch of perverts. Okay, I like a nude photo every once in a while, but taking any celebrity and having them strip for a cause, not to mention that their all women, seems like there out for the sex appeal more than anything else. Now where’s my hamburger.

Reply